Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike Theobald's avatar

People keep asking why NYC schools start after Labor Day like it’s some long-standing tradition or obvious good.

It’s not.

That schedule didn’t just appear out of nowhere. It came out of the 2005 contract under Randi Weingarten during the Bloomberg years. And it wasn’t free.

In that deal, UFT members gave up the fixed rate of 8.25% percent on our TDA. It went from a fixed rate of 8.25% to 7%, decreasing by 1.25%. That doesn’t sound like much until you understand what that means over a career. That was real money, compounded over decades, taken out of members’ retirements.

In return, one of the “quality of life wins was starting school after Labor Day.

So when people say we start late, understand that we paid for that. Every single year. With interest.

And here’s the part that should bother people. Newer members, especially Tier 6, are still living with the financial loss from that deal, but most have no idea it even happened.

We’re still carrying the cost of decisions that were made 20 years ago, and leadership rarely explains it.

Nothing about our calendar is accidental. It was negotiated and it came at a price.

The same leadership today is still in control

The college board and AP exams don’t care that Randi made a deal for post Labor Day to save management some money. We have less time as AP teachers

T Ferguson's avatar

DOE policy is contracted out to the UFT and few in the recent municipal election seemed to care.

No posts

Ready for more?